Exploring value and utility in decision making.

My travels this summer took me to some wonderful and beautiful parts of the world, some a little more remote than others and at all times away from my laptop. When in one of the more remote locations I had limited access to electricity and I was without power to charge my smartphone for some time.  It was during these ‘outages’ that I realised just how reliant I have become on my phone. I was thinking about what I actually do on my phone; E-mail, SMS, messaging, social media, store my music, my video content, check weather forecasts, tell the time, run my calendar, pass the time with games, read the news… the list goes on, I even make the odd phone call on it!

It was then I thought to myself that I run my entire life from pretty much one device. For some of the functions such as e-mail and viewing content it is a secondary device but it also adds the value of convenience which makes up for what you lose in functionality. This goes back to some of the points I have been trying to get across for the past few months in my blog and that is about the perception of value and the benefit I think it can add to discussions on public policy, not just in the telecoms sector but across many fields.

When considering the benefit from a public policy priority and when setting the agenda for decisions, currently, not enough focus is placed on utility and value. Take for example my case, in a very rural region I took most value from not having a particularly high speed connection but from being connected at a useful speed and being able to function. This is not to say that rural locations should receive lesser levels of service, simply that utility could affect technology choice. I believe individualisation is the key when looking at utility but I also believe it could be aggregated to provide much clearer data and lead to much more efficient decisions being made.

I will be exploring this idea hopefully in some more detail over the coming weeks and months. I would like to try and see where you truly get value from your devices, connections and services? Can it lead to a more detailed and better informed decision making process?

 
  1. Oto Ka

    simply that utility could affect technology choice. +1
    Sep 10 2012  
    1. Phillip Malloch

      Oto, in full agreement. I guess the crux of my point being that sometimes suboptinal choices are made due to the lack of understanding or consideration of utility. The focus is often placed a single winning idea or technology when it's maybe not the best path to take.
      Sep 13 2012  
       
 

Join the discussion

The purpose of the comments is to create constructive dialogue on the content of the Newsroom. The simple rules are as follows: stay focused on the topic and show respect. Comments that contain personal attacks, are racist or are inappropriate will be removed by the editor.

 

Written by

  • Phillip
    Malloch

    European Affairs Manager
    TeliaSonera
     

    I joined TeliaSonera in 2007 as European Affairs Manager based in Brussels before that I worked for Telefónica O2 also in their Brussels representation. My job is to look after TeliaSonera’s relations with the EU institutions. I am usually focused on issues such as roaming, spectrum policy, investment, network access and net neutrality. I am also Chairman of GSMA Europe’s Regulatory operator expert group. In my spare time I am a passionate cricket fan and player.


Secondary Navigation

Browse news


Brands